It was not long ago, in societal terms, that the prevailing consensus of taking a life—whether your own or another’s—was wrong. Three revealing social markers can be examined to show how our society once viewed death by unnatural means.
It was not long ago, in societal terms, that the prevailing consensus of taking a life—whether your own or another’s—was wrong. Three revealing social markers can be examined to show how our society once viewed death by unnatural means.
Although the Bible does not speak specifically about “assisted dying” it does paint a clear picture on how God views human life.
Matt Walsh recently posted a video on Flock cameras, and, quite simply, he gets this one wrong. Usually his purpose is generally clear: to examine cultural and historical questions through logic, humor, and a willingness to challenge conventional thinking. That is precisely why this particular video deserves scrutiny. Strong work in one area does not make every conclusion sound, and on the issue of Flock cameras, his reasoning falls short.
This article is a reaction and a critique to a recent interview between Andrew Gold and Warren Smith. The interview was initially slated to be a discussion regarding Smith’s experience with a J. K. Rowling controversy, but turned into a deeper philosophical debate about reality, faith, and morality.
The twenty-fifth anniversary of the September 11, 2001, attacks provides an appropriate occasion to revisit questions that, for many, remain unresolved. What follows is an examination of several of those questions and the broader issues they raise.